美方承认犯下大错！特朗普之前真的没料到，中国敢跟美国这么打

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. significantly underestimated China's economic resilience and countermeasures in the ongoing trade conflict, stemming from a long-standing arrogant mindset that economic pressure would force China to concede [2][4][8]. Group 1: U.S. Tariff Actions - The U.S. imposed a 34% tariff on Chinese goods, raising the total tariff burden to 54% when combined with previous tariffs [2]. - On April 3, China responded with a 34% tariff on all U.S. products, demonstrating its preparedness and strategic resolve [4]. - The U.S. initially reacted with threats, including a warning of an additional 50% tariff if China did not retract its tariffs by April 8 [4]. Group 2: China's Countermeasures - China escalated its tariff to 84% on April 10 and included 12 U.S. companies in its export control list, marking a shift from defensive to proactive measures [6]. - The U.S. tariffs could have reached as high as 145%, revealing the rigidity of U.S. strategies against China's economic flexibility [6]. - China strengthened cooperation with the EU and ASEAN to mitigate export impacts and advanced domestic technology innovation, particularly in semiconductors and electric vehicles [6]. Group 3: Misjudgments and Strategic Shifts - U.S. officials privately acknowledged their failure to accurately predict China's response, reflecting a misunderstanding of China's expanding domestic market and global supply chain adjustments [8]. - China's counteractions not only deterred potential followers but also set an example for global trade partners in maintaining sovereignty [8]. - Following the peak of tariffs, Trump began signaling a willingness to engage in dialogue, admitting that high tariffs were unsustainable [10]. Group 4: Current Trade Dynamics - The situation has begun to stabilize, with the U.S. gradually lowering tariffs and many countries maintaining tariffs around 15%, leading to a more rational trade interaction between China and the U.S. [12]. - China revised its foreign trade laws to enhance its response capabilities, effective from 2026, showcasing its institutional advantages [12]. - Despite a global trade growth slowdown to 2.5% in the first three quarters of 2025, China's trade with Africa grew by 15%, indicating the effectiveness of its strategic pivot [12]. Group 5: Long-term Implications - The trade landscape is shifting from U.S.-dominated to a multipolar framework, with complaints from U.S. allies about policy confusion [16]. - China's ability to engage in this trade conflict stems from its economic strength and strategic acumen, which has propelled its high-quality development and maintained global trade fairness [16].