战败八十年，日本仍未算清历史账、安全账（国际论坛）

Core Viewpoint - Japan should not treat the tensions caused by Prime Minister Kishi's remarks as speculative capital but should take this opportunity to confront its historical responsibilities and reflect on its role in regional security [2][4]. Group 1: Historical Reflection - This year marks the 80th anniversary of the victory in the World Anti-Fascist War, prompting Japan to reassess its history of external aggression [2]. - The new Prime Minister Kishi Sema's comments on Taiwan have escalated tensions, leading to a strong protest from China, which indicates a significant deterioration in Japan-China relations [2][3]. - The lack of awareness among some Japanese citizens regarding the seriousness of the situation reflects a broader issue: Japan has never fully confronted its wartime responsibilities [2][3]. Group 2: Security and Military Posture - The term "security assurance" has become prevalent in Japanese society, but discussions have shifted towards identifying enemies and enhancing military capabilities rather than preventing the recurrence of war [3]. - Kishi's statements have increased the risk of Japan's involvement in the Taiwan issue, marking a potential shift towards military intervention, which China perceives as a direct threat [3]. - Japan's post-war commitment to a "peace constitution" is being undermined, as the government has not adequately explained its increasing military expenditures and the potential shift from a defensive to a more aggressive military posture [3][4]. Group 3: Media and Public Sentiment - Japanese media often frames external crises with a focus on China, reflecting a societal trend towards hardline stances during election periods [4]. - The fervor for a hardline approach raises questions about the underlying motivations and the need for Japan to reassess the heavy costs of war [4].