现场调查！拥有“黄金”招牌的金雅福爆雷后人去楼空，“买卖+委托”模式是否涉嫌非法吸存

Core Viewpoint - The Shenzhen Jinyafu Holding Group, once a prominent player in the "China Top 500 Enterprises" list, has faced a sudden collapse by the end of 2025, transitioning from a symbol of wealth to a state of debt and disputes [2][3]. Group 1: Company Overview and Crisis Development - Jinyafu's crisis began in June 2025 when its high-yield financial products, centered around "golden entrusted purchase and sale," started experiencing interrupted returns, leading to widespread defaults by November, with estimated funds involved reaching 7 to 8 billion yuan [3][4]. - The company's headquarters in Shenzhen has become deserted, with reports of unpaid rent and utilities, indicating a complete operational shutdown [2][3]. Group 2: Investment Model and Legal Concerns - Jinyafu's investment model involved a dual contract structure, where investors signed a "gold physical purchase contract" and subsequently a "trust contract" with an affiliated company, promising fixed annual returns of 8% to 14% [6]. - Legal experts have pointed out that this model exhibits characteristics of a Ponzi scheme, as the promised high returns are not supported by actual profits from gold trading, which typically yields a net profit margin of only 2% to 3% [7][10]. Group 3: Investor Impact and Response - Many investors, including employees of Jinyafu, have reported significant financial losses, with some investing large sums under the belief of guaranteed returns, only to find themselves in a precarious situation as the company ceased operations [7][8][10]. - The local government has intervened, forming a task force to oversee the situation, while proposed solutions like "debt-to-equity swaps" have been met with skepticism from investors [12][14]. Group 4: Regulatory and Legal Implications - The case highlights regulatory gaps in the "industry + finance" crossover model, where Jinyafu exploited a lack of oversight by presenting itself as a legitimate trading entity while engaging in illegal fundraising activities [14][15]. - Legal experts suggest that if classified as illegal fundraising, the contracts could be deemed void, and investors may have the right to claim their funds back through law enforcement [14][15].