“让美大型石油公司进入 为委内瑞拉赚钱”！特朗普宣布将“管理”委内瑞拉 直至实施“安全”过渡 多国表态

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent military action by the United States against Venezuela, resulting in the capture of President Nicolás Maduro, which has been characterized by President Trump as a significant display of U.S. military power and a necessary intervention to restore order in Venezuela [4][5][10]. Group 1: Military Action and Its Implications - President Trump described the military action as unprecedented since World War II, claiming it demonstrated the effectiveness of U.S. military capabilities [4]. - Trump stated that all military capabilities of Venezuela have been "completely paralyzed," and he emphasized the U.S. intention to govern Venezuela until a safe power transition can occur [4][5]. - The U.S. military operation was portrayed as complex and highly effective, with Trump claiming no U.S. casualties or losses during the operation [8][9]. Group 2: Economic Interests - Trump indicated that the U.S. would allow major American oil companies to invest billions in Venezuela to repair its oil infrastructure, which he described as a long-standing failure [5]. - He reiterated the U.S. commitment to maintaining a complete oil embargo against Venezuela until U.S. demands are fully met [5]. Group 3: International Reactions - The Venezuelan government condemned the U.S. actions as a violation of international law and called for the immediate release of Maduro and his wife [10][14]. - Various countries, including Russia and France, expressed strong opposition to the U.S. military intervention, emphasizing the need to respect Venezuela's sovereignty and international law [14][17][22]. - Protests against the U.S. military action erupted in multiple U.S. cities, with demonstrators calling for an end to military intervention in Venezuela [11][13].