AI赋权之争，藏着炒股的底层逻辑

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes the importance of not being deceived by superficial appearances, whether in AI or stock trading, and instead focusing on the underlying essence [1][9] - Joshua Bengio, known as the "father of AI," publicly opposes granting legal rights to AI, arguing that current AI systems do not possess self-awareness but merely execute programmed tasks [1] - The article draws a parallel between AI's perceived self-protection and the misleading nature of stock price movements, highlighting that both can be misinterpreted if one only looks at surface-level indicators [1][9] Group 2 - The article discusses the challenges investors face in discerning genuine trends in stock prices, often leading to poor investment decisions based on superficial observations [2][4] - It illustrates the importance of analyzing trading behavior data to uncover the true intentions behind stock price movements, differentiating between institutional and retail investor actions [4][6] - A case study is presented where one stock, influenced by institutional buying, increased by 25%, while another stock, driven by retail investors, fell by 18%, underscoring the significance of understanding market dynamics [6][8] Group 3 - The article concludes that the key ability in both AI and stock trading is to penetrate beyond surface appearances to grasp the underlying reality, which can lead to more informed and successful investment decisions [9]