美国特种部队抓走马杜罗，看上去咄咄逼人，其实是露怯了

Core Viewpoint - The recent capture of Venezuelan President Maduro by the United States has sparked global criticism, highlighting concerns over U.S. interventionism and violations of national sovereignty [1][3]. Group 1: U.S. Actions and Strategy - The U.S. is perceived as demonstrating its weakness through aggressive actions that indicate a departure from the post-World War II international order [3][5]. - The U.S. has shifted its focus towards a new Monroe Doctrine, concentrating its efforts on Latin America while attempting to suppress leftist governments in the region [5][11]. - The operation to capture Maduro was executed with minimal cost and risk, reflecting a strategy of low-cost control rather than engaging in large-scale ground wars [9][15]. Group 2: Implications for Latin America - The U.S. aims to dismantle the leftist alliance in Latin America, secure control over Venezuelan oil resources, and deter other nations from collaborating with the region [11][17]. - The capture has provoked strong backlash from various Latin American countries, which have condemned the U.S. for violating international law [13][17]. - The action is seen as a reflection of U.S. strategic retreat, revealing its inability to maintain global hegemony while attempting to assert dominance in its backyard [17].