商务部回应欧盟碳边境调节机制有关问题

Core Viewpoint - The European Union's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) is set to be implemented on January 1, 2026, with significant implications for trade and climate policy, particularly affecting Chinese products and industries [2][3] Group 1: CBAM Implementation and Impact - The EU has recently released legislative proposals and implementation details regarding CBAM, including setting default carbon emission intensity values and plans to expand the product coverage [2] - The default carbon emission intensity values set by the EU are significantly higher than China's current levels and future development trends, which is viewed as unfair and discriminatory treatment towards Chinese products [2] - The EU plans to expand the CBAM scope to include approximately 180 steel and aluminum-intensive downstream products, such as machinery, automobiles, and household appliances, starting in 2028 [2] Group 2: Concerns Over Trade Practices - The EU's actions are seen as a violation of World Trade Organization principles, including "most-favored-nation" and "national treatment," and contradict the "common but differentiated responsibilities" principle established by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change [2] - The EU's dual approach of promoting green policies externally while relaxing regulations internally is characterized as a double standard, undermining international cooperation on climate change [3] - The imposition of EU carbon standards on developing countries is expected to increase the costs of climate action for these nations, damaging international trust and cooperation efforts [3] Group 3: Call for Fair Trade Practices - The Chinese side urges the EU to adhere to international climate and trade rules, reject unilateralism and protectionism, and promote the liberalization and facilitation of trade and investment in the green sector [3] - There is a commitment from the Chinese side to respond to any unfair trade restrictions and to protect its development interests and the legitimate rights of Chinese enterprises [3]