高市早苗涉台谬论是对国际法理的严重挑衅（国际论坛）

Group 1 - The core argument is that Japan's Prime Minister, high-ranking officials, and their statements regarding Taiwan represent a challenge to international order, violate commitments, and breach fundamental principles of international law [1][2][3] Group 2 - Japan's historical commitments regarding Taiwan, established during the normalization of diplomatic relations with China in 1972, affirm that Taiwan should be returned to China and that Japan recognizes this as a binding obligation [2] - The assertion that "Taiwan's situation" could trigger Japan's collective self-defense rights is seen as an attempt to legitimize intervention in China's internal affairs, which contradicts international agreements and laws [3] - The article emphasizes that any actions by Japan that cross these lines will face significant backlash and condemnation from China and the international community [3]