子思：如果“马杜罗事件”是个转折点，世界将走向何方？

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the geopolitical implications of the U.S. military's abduction of Venezuelan President Maduro, highlighting a shift away from established international norms and principles, suggesting a rise in "great power terrorism" that undermines the sovereignty of smaller nations [1][7][10]. Group 1: U.S. Actions and International Law - The U.S. military's operation to capture Maduro is seen as a blatant violation of international law, contrasting with past actions that at least maintained a facade of respect for sovereignty [5][6]. - The article compares the current situation with the 1989 U.S. invasion of Panama, noting that the recent actions lack the legal justifications and procedural respect that were previously observed [3][5]. - The U.S. has reinterpreted international law to justify its actions, effectively removing constraints on its military interventions by claiming exceptions for those labeled as drug terrorists [5][6]. Group 2: Implications for Smaller Nations - The concept of "great power terrorism" is introduced, indicating that the U.S.'s disregard for international norms poses a significant threat to the security of smaller nations [7][10]. - The article emphasizes that the U.S. has developed a unique capability to target adversaries through a combination of legal, media, and military strategies, which smaller countries cannot match [7][8]. - Following the abduction of Maduro, there is a growing sense of "sovereignty anxiety" among nations, as the traditional protections offered by international law are perceived to be eroding [10].