波兰总统震撼发声：别再把俄当敌人！欧洲反俄团结彻底露馅

Group 1 - The core debate in Poland regarding the EU's policy towards Russia highlights a significant division, with President Duda advocating for a shift away from viewing Russia as the main enemy, while Prime Minister Tusk insists on maintaining a hardline stance due to perceived threats [2][3][4] - Tusk argues that relaxing vigilance towards Russia could jeopardize European security and undermine support for Ukraine, emphasizing the necessity of sanctions as a means to uphold democratic values [3][4] - Duda counters that Europe's security should not rely solely on confrontational sanctions but rather on establishing a diverse security framework that includes dialogue and cooperation with neighboring countries, including Russia [3][4] Group 2 - The public disagreement between the Polish President and Prime Minister reflects a broader split within the EU regarding its approach to Russia, with some member states beginning to question the sustainability of ongoing sanctions due to economic repercussions [4][5] - The EU's sanctions against Russia have reportedly resulted in over €1 trillion in losses for the bloc, raising concerns about the long-term viability of such measures and their impact on European economic interests [5][6] - The EU's trade with Russia has plummeted from €417 billion in 2013 to approximately €60 billion in 2023, indicating a drastic reduction in economic ties that has led to soaring energy prices and business closures across Europe [5][6] Group 3 - The EU's energy crisis response involves seeking alternative energy supplies, with the EU Energy Agency playing a crucial role in coordinating imports from other regions, although specific procurement costs remain undisclosed [6] - There is a growing sentiment among various countries within the anti-Russian coalition, including the US, to explore localized cooperation with Russia, indicating a potential shift in strategy [6][7] - The myth of European unity against Russia is fading, suggesting that pragmatic dialogue may be the more effective path forward for the EU [7]