Federal Appeals Court Sides With Natural Grocers® in GMO Labeling Case

Core Insights - The recent court ruling mandates clearer and more transparent labeling for GMO products, requiring the USDA to revise its rules for accurate and accessible disclosures [1][2]. Group 1: GMO Labeling and Regulations - The court recognized the inadequacies of the USDA's final rule, emphasizing that consumers deserve clear and accurate GMO labeling [2]. - The ruling rejected the exclusive use of QR codes for GMO disclosures, stating that not all consumers have access to smartphones or reliable internet [8]. - The USDA was found to be incorrect in exempting highly processed foods from labeling requirements, necessitating a correction in their next rulemaking [8]. Group 2: Natural Grocers' Position and Standards - Natural Grocers has been advocating for GMO labeling since 2012 and prohibits most GMO ingredients in its products, including those from new genetic techniques [3][4]. - The company maintains strict quality guidelines, ensuring that products do not contain artificial additives and are USDA-certified organic [7]. - Natural Grocers has a dynamic list of problematic ingredients, which is regularly updated to ensure only high-quality products are sold [5]. Group 3: Company Overview - Founded in 1955, Natural Grocers operates 168 stores across 21 states, focusing on natural and organic groceries, body care products, and dietary supplements [10]. - The company is committed to its Five Founding Principles, including a strong focus on community and employee welfare, investing over $16 million in crew compensation in fiscal year 2025 [10].