KKV卓悦中心撤店罗生门：当履约博弈遇上商业规则

Core Viewpoint - The conflict between KKV and OneAvenue shopping center stems from a mismatch in expectations regarding performance and rental agreements, leading to KKV's store closure and subsequent legal disputes [2][3][4]. Group 1: Conflict Background - The conflict began in September 2025 when OneAvenue attempted to negotiate with KKV regarding underperformance, ultimately leading to the termination of the lease on December 31, 2025 [3]. - KKV's parent company, KK Group, claims that they have fulfilled their contractual obligations for over four years without any disputes raised by OneAvenue regarding unpaid commission rent [6][7]. - OneAvenue asserts that KKV has consistently failed to meet agreed performance standards and has never paid the contractually stipulated commission rent, constituting a fundamental breach of contract [4][5]. Group 2: Contractual Dispute - The rental agreement includes both fixed and commission rent, with the higher of the two being applicable, and KKV has acknowledged that they have not paid the commission rent [7][9]. - OneAvenue's decision to terminate the lease was based on KKV's failure to pay commission rent, which is a common practice in shopping center agreements [8][9]. - KK Group argues that the lack of commission rent payments is not solely due to KKV's operational failures, citing low foot traffic and unmet brand promises from OneAvenue as contributing factors [7][10]. Group 3: KKV's Business Context - KKV has been closing stores across various locations, with over 10 closures reported in 2025, while maintaining a total of over 600 stores in China and 700 globally [10][11]. - KK Group operates multiple retail brands and has been expanding cautiously compared to competitors, with a focus on maintaining brand recognition and market presence [11][12]. - Despite challenges, KK Group has shown signs of revenue growth, reporting a revenue of 47.69 billion yuan in the first ten months of 2023, with a net profit of 2.09 billion yuan [12].