修车后同轴左右轮胎花纹不一致，法院判4S店欺诈退一赔三

Core Viewpoint - The court ruled in favor of Mr. Chen, ordering the 4S dealership to refund the cost of the tire and pay additional compensation due to fraudulent practices regarding the replacement of non-original tires [5][6]. Group 1: Case Background - Mr. Chen's Cadillac was sent to a 4S dealership for repairs after a traffic accident in 2020, where he was charged over 52,000 yuan for various repairs, including a rear tire replacement [2]. - During a routine vehicle inspection in 2025, it was discovered that the left and right rear tires had different tread patterns, leading to a failed inspection [2][3]. - Mr. Chen claimed that the dealership did not inform him that non-original tires were used, which he considered deceptive [2][3]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - The 4S dealership argued that they had informed Mr. Chen about the use of non-original tires and that he had signed the settlement statement acknowledging this [3][4]. - The court found that the dealership failed to adequately inform Mr. Chen about the risks associated with using non-original tires, which led to his misunderstanding [4][5]. - The court emphasized that the dealership's documentation did not clearly indicate the change in tire type, constituting fraud [4][5]. Group 3: Court Ruling - The court ordered the dealership to refund the tire cost of 1,127 yuan and pay an additional compensation of 3,381 yuan to Mr. Chen [5]. - The ruling highlighted the dealership's responsibility to ensure customer awareness of significant changes in service, particularly regarding safety standards [4][5].