良莠不齐的清洁生产审核服务市场，谁来“审核”？

Group 1 - A plating company in the Yangtze River Delta has failed to pass the clean production audit three times due to various reasons, including high energy consumption and inadequate management systems [1][2] - The company has spent hundreds of thousands of yuan on changing technical service providers to pass the audit, but this has negatively impacted its motivation to implement clean production [1] - In Guangzhou, out of 205 companies participating in the clean production audit in 2025, only two conducted the audit independently, while the majority relied on technical service providers [1] Group 2 - The rapid increase in the number of clean production technical service institutions has led to significant disparities in service quality, affecting the overall emission reduction effectiveness for companies [2] - Many service providers are engaged in unfair competition, with 42 out of 73 institutions serving only one company, indicating a lack of comprehensive service capabilities [2] - Some companies have a low understanding of the importance of clean production, leading to minimal involvement in the audit process and reliance on service providers [2] Group 3 - To improve the service quality of clean production institutions, local authorities should enhance management and supervision, including regular audits of submitted materials [3] - Encouraging companies to take an active role in the clean production audit process can significantly enhance service quality, such as involving key personnel in the preparation of clean production plans [3] - Establishing a support mechanism involving experts to provide free technical consultation and policy guidance can help improve the quality of services provided by technical institutions [4]