Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article discusses Trump's Americas strategy and its implications for China's future, emphasizing the ongoing nature of U.S. hegemony and the potential opportunities for China within a "three-part world" framework [1][3][20] - The article outlines the historical context of U.S. hegemony, detailing its consistent use of military intervention and geopolitical pressure since the end of the Cold War [3][4][9] - Trump's strategy is characterized as a continuation of U.S. hegemonic logic, focusing on consolidating control over the Americas, particularly through the lens of resource acquisition and geopolitical dominance [6][8][20] Group 2 - The "three-part world" concept suggests a balance among China, the U.S., and Russia, which aligns with current global trends, rather than a simplistic view of confrontation or compromise [11][15] - Trump's approach differs fundamentally from Biden's, as he aims to refocus U.S. efforts on the Americas while allowing Russia to counterbalance Europe and China to lead in Asia [13][15] - China's strategic priority remains on resolving key issues within Asia, such as the Taiwan question and relations with neighboring countries, rather than engaging in direct confrontation with the U.S. in the Americas [18][20] Group 3 - The article identifies four major challenges facing China's Asian strategy: the Taiwan issue, the Philippines' fluctuating stance, Japan's historical antagonism, and India's ambiguous position [18] - China's approach to U.S. actions in the Americas is characterized by moral support rather than military confrontation, focusing on stabilizing its position in Asia first [18][20] - The conclusion emphasizes that China's strategic choices are rational responses to the global landscape and that addressing Asian issues is crucial for its long-term goals of national rejuvenation and establishing a fairer global order [20]
特朗普打响美洲战略第一枪,全球局势大变,中美俄要三分天下?
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2026-01-08 10:45