美突袭委内瑞拉背后的推手

Group 1: Lobbying Interference - Wall Street investors have lobbied the U.S. government to create favorable conditions for American companies to operate in Venezuela's key supply chains, aiming to leverage economic influence in the energy market [2] - The lobbying efforts, while not explicitly aimed at regime change, have inadvertently opened the door for such actions [2] Group 2: Financial Gains - Prior to the U.S. intervention in Venezuela, Wall Street began increasing investment seminars focused on Venezuelan assets, with predictions that a regime change could lead to a 60% increase in bond prices [3] - On the first trading day following the U.S. military action, Venezuelan bondholders gained approximately $4 billion, with expectations of further profits from potential debt restructuring [3] - Major asset management firms, including Fidelity, BlackRock, and Prudential, hold Venezuelan bonds that saw a 35% price increase following the military intervention [3] Group 3: Asset Acquisition - Following the military intervention, Venezuela, previously seen as an investment risk, is attracting attention from major business players [4] - Chevron is negotiating with the U.S. government to expand its operational licenses in Venezuela to increase crude oil exports [4] - Elliott Management, a prominent hedge fund, stands to benefit from U.S. commitments to intervene in Venezuela's oil sector, with court approvals facilitating asset acquisitions [4] Group 4: Control Over Oil Resources - The U.S. has taken military actions to block Venezuelan oil flow while simultaneously exerting pressure to control oil sales, with statements from U.S. officials indicating a long-term strategy to manage Venezuelan oil revenues [5] - The U.S. aims to stabilize and increase Venezuelan oil production while ensuring that sales revenues are deposited into U.S.-controlled accounts [5] - The interplay of political intervention, financial market profits, and asset acquisition illustrates how Wall Street capital collaborates with political entities to create a profit loop, becoming a significant driver of U.S. foreign intervention [5]