美国再退66个“群”，单边行径引发广泛批评（国际视点）

Core Viewpoint - The United States, under President Trump, has decided to withdraw from 66 international organizations deemed "not in the interest of the United States," which has sparked widespread criticism domestically and internationally, potentially isolating the U.S. and undermining its global reputation [1][2]. Group 1: Withdrawal from International Organizations - The withdrawal includes 31 UN entities and 35 non-UN organizations, covering various fields such as climate, immigration, energy, human rights, and economic development [1]. - This action is part of a broader trend of unilateralism by the U.S., which has previously exited significant agreements like the Paris Agreement and the World Health Organization [2]. - The U.S. State Department is continuing to evaluate its relationships with other international organizations, indicating the possibility of further withdrawals in the future [2]. Group 2: Impact on Global Cooperation - The U.S. withdrawal is seen as a significant setback for global cooperation, particularly in addressing issues like climate change, where the U.S. will miss out on participating in the establishment of global green industry rules [6][7]. - The actions taken by the U.S. are likely to disrupt the functioning of international governance systems, particularly the United Nations, which is already facing internal reform challenges [6][7]. Group 3: Domestic Political Implications - The "America First" policy is viewed as a strategy to cater to domestic populist sentiments, with the Trump administration using withdrawal from international agreements to deflect attention from internal issues [4]. - This approach is perceived as a means to consolidate support from conservative voters by blaming international organizations for domestic economic and social problems [4]. Group 4: Economic Considerations - The U.S. government claims that these withdrawals will save funds, but analysts argue that this reflects a reluctance to contribute to global public goods and a desire to focus resources on domestic economic protection [5]. - The withdrawal is also seen as a way for the U.S. to escape international regulations that may hinder its trade protectionist measures and unilateral sanctions [5].