美国再退66个“群”，单边行径引发广泛批评

Core Viewpoint - The United States, under President Trump, has signed a memorandum to withdraw from 66 international organizations deemed "not in the interest of the U.S." This unprecedented unilateral action has drawn widespread criticism domestically and internationally, suggesting it will further isolate the U.S. and weaken its international credibility, negatively impacting global multilateral cooperation [1][2]. Group 1: Withdrawal Details - The organizations from which the U.S. is withdrawing include 31 UN entities and 35 non-UN organizations, covering various fields such as climate, immigration, energy, human rights, economic development, and legal cooperation [1]. - The White House claims these organizations operate against U.S. national interests and security, prioritizing globalism over core U.S. interests, or are inefficient in addressing important issues [1][2]. Group 2: Historical Context - This action is part of a broader trend of U.S. unilateralism, with previous withdrawals from significant agreements like the Paris Agreement, Iran nuclear deal, and World Health Organization during Trump's first term [2]. - Following Trump's return to office in 2025, the pace of withdrawals has accelerated, with a comprehensive review of U.S. relations with international organizations leading to the current list of 66 [2]. Group 3: Implications for Global Cooperation - The U.S. has shifted from selective engagement to systematic disengagement from multilateral cooperation, as evidenced by its absence from key international meetings and its failure to fulfill obligations under treaties like the Chemical Weapons Convention [3]. - The trend of U.S. withdrawal is seen as a move to maintain its global hegemony, with international cooperation being contingent on U.S. interests [4]. Group 4: Domestic Political Factors - The withdrawal strategy aligns with domestic political motives, appealing to populist sentiments among certain voter groups, as the Trump administration seeks to externalize domestic issues and blame international organizations for economic and social problems [4][5]. Group 5: Economic Considerations - The U.S. views these withdrawals as a means to protect its economic interests and evade international responsibilities, aiming to redirect resources towards domestic industries and economic expansion [5]. - Critics argue that this approach undermines global economic stability and could lead to long-term negative consequences for the U.S. economy [6]. Group 6: Global Impact - The unilateral withdrawal is expected to exacerbate the U.S.'s international isolation and diminish its influence in critical areas such as climate change, where it will miss opportunities to shape global green industry standards [6][7]. - The actions taken by the U.S. are seen as damaging to the foundations of international cooperation, hindering the functioning of global governance systems and prompting concerns about the stability of international markets [6][7].