幼童与少年的海底捞事件，为何责任差别那么大？

Core Viewpoint - A recent incident involving a child throwing a diaper into a hot pot at a Haidilao restaurant has sparked public attention, raising questions about legal responsibility and the implications for the restaurant's reputation [5][6][10]. Group 1: Incident Details - The incident occurred on December 31, 2025, at the Haidilao restaurant in Xuzhou, where a two-year-old child threw a diaper into the dining pot, leading the restaurant to dispose of the pot and report the incident to the police [6][10]. - The restaurant is operating normally, and the police have taken action against the child's guardian present at the time [5][6]. Group 2: Legal Implications - According to legal experts, the child, being two years old, is classified as having no civil capacity under Chinese law, meaning the guardian is fully responsible for any damages caused by the child's actions [7][10]. - In contrast, a previous incident involving two 17-year-olds who urinated in a hot pot was treated differently, as they are considered to have limited civil capacity and were held accountable for their actions, resulting in a court-ordered compensation of 2.2 million yuan [6][10]. Group 3: Nature of Behavior and Responsibility - The behavior of the two-year-old is viewed as unintentional and exploratory, with the focus on the guardian's negligence in supervision [9][10]. - The actions of the 17-year-olds were deemed intentional and malicious, leading to a higher level of legal accountability and significant financial repercussions for their actions [9][10]. Group 4: Broader Context and Recommendations - This incident reflects a broader issue of uncivil behavior in public dining spaces, which is not unique to Haidilao but also seen in other major chains like McDonald's and Starbucks [11]. - Legal experts emphasize the importance of guardians fulfilling their responsibilities in public settings, advocating for clear rules and accountability mechanisms to maintain public order and protect businesses [11].