又“退群”，“美国优先”带来的将是“美国独行”

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. government's large-scale withdrawal from international organizations signifies a comprehensive upgrade of its unilateral foreign policy, driven by the principle of "America First," which reflects a self-serving approach to diplomacy [1][2] Group 1: U.S. Withdrawal from International Organizations - The U.S. is set to exit various international organizations related to climate governance, public health, human rights, education, refugee assistance, and sustainable development, indicating a prioritization of national interests over global cooperation [1] - The U.S. increasingly seeks to maximize its own benefits in foreign affairs, viewing the provision of global public goods as misaligned with its self-interest [1] - The rise of the "Global South" has led to emerging markets and developing countries gaining more influence in international organizations, which the U.S. perceives as disadvantageous, contributing to a sense of "losing out" [1] Group 2: Implications for Global Governance - The U.S. withdrawal poses challenges for global governance, particularly in addressing climate change and other global issues, and weakens multilateral mechanisms for coordinating economic and social development [2] - The eventual outcome of the "America First" policy is likely to result in the U.S. becoming isolated from the global community [2] - In response to these changes, the international community must accelerate efforts to form a collective response and advance global governance across various issues and fields [2]