特朗普承认自己犯了大错，万万没想到中国竟敢这样跟美国硬碰硬

Core Insights - The article discusses the miscalculations made by the U.S. during the trade war with China, highlighting that the U.S. underestimated China's preparedness and resilience in the face of tariffs [1][22][36] Group 1: U.S. Strategy and Miscalculations - The U.S. believed that imposing high tariffs would force China to concede due to its reliance on the U.S. market [3][4] - The assumption that China would be a passive participant in the trade war proved incorrect, as China had prepared a comprehensive response strategy [5][24] - The U.S. initially expected a "buffer period" for companies to adjust, which was quickly dispelled by China's immediate retaliatory measures [10][12] Group 2: China's Response and Strategy - China's countermeasures included imposing equal tariffs and strategically halting the approval of imports for critical U.S. products, demonstrating a calculated approach [9][12] - The focus on less publicized but essential products for U.S. companies, such as medical equipment components, showcased China's ability to target vulnerabilities effectively [13][16] - China's export controls on rare earth elements highlighted its strategic leverage, as the U.S. heavily relies on Chinese supply chains for these critical materials [14][16] Group 3: Economic Impact and Trade Dynamics - The U.S. experienced rising domestic prices and reduced fiscal revenue due to high tariffs, which did not yield the intended economic pressure on China [18][20] - Despite expectations of a significant decline in exports, China saw growth in trade with Africa, ASEAN, and the EU, indicating resilience and adaptability [20][22] - The trade war catalyzed China's shift towards higher-value exports, with electric vehicles and advanced machinery now comprising over half of its total exports [20][31] Group 4: Future Trade Relations - The trade relationship between the U.S. and China has entered a "new stable cycle," characterized by a balance of competition and cooperation in non-sensitive areas [27][28] - U.S. companies, despite government rhetoric, have increased their investments in China, indicating a pragmatic approach to the intertwined global supply chains [29][31] - The article concludes that both nations have learned from the trade war, leading to a more nuanced understanding of their economic interdependence [40][46]