Sou Hu Cai Jing·2026-01-11 04:44Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the aggressive stance of the United States towards Venezuela's oil trade, highlighting the imposition of unilateral demands and the underlying motives of U.S. actions in the region [1][3][5]. Group 1: U.S. Actions and Demands - The U.S. has arrested Venezuelan President Maduro and appointed Secretary of State Rubio as the governor of Venezuela, demanding that Venezuelan oil be prioritized for U.S. interests [1]. - The U.S. requires Venezuela to sever economic ties with China, Russia, Iran, and Cuba, and to expel spies from these countries [1]. - The U.S. claims that its refineries can only process heavy crude oil, which is why it seeks to partner with Venezuela, despite previously relying on Canada for heavy crude imports [3]. Group 2: International Reactions and Implications - Countries like Cuba and Mexico have condemned the U.S. actions as blatant violations of international law, indicating a growing global opposition to U.S. imperialism [3]. - The U.S. has previously seized a Chinese oil tanker, further escalating tensions and drawing protests from China, which has vowed to defend its rights [5]. - The article suggests that the U.S. is attempting to undermine China's energy interests by demanding that Venezuela redirect oil orders from China to the U.S. [5]. Group 3: Future Outlook - The article posits that the U.S. will face consequences for its aggressive actions, as the international community's opposition to such behavior is likely to intensify [5][7]. - It emphasizes that the notion of U.S. oil hegemony is challenged by principles of sovereignty and multilateral justice, suggesting that the U.S. ambitions may ultimately fail [7].