特朗普抢走5000万桶油，中国为何一桶不买？石油战场惊现“反杀局”

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the strategic implications of the U.S. government's actions in seizing 50 million barrels of Venezuelan oil and China's refusal to purchase any of it, highlighting a significant shift in the global energy landscape and the evolving power dynamics between the U.S. and China [1][10]. Group 1: U.S. Actions and Implications - The U.S. government, under the Trump administration, has effectively seized approximately 50 million barrels of Venezuelan crude oil, valued at over $3 billion based on current Brent oil prices, through military means and strategic agreements with major U.S. oil companies [3]. - The U.S. is pushing for a "Petroleum Custody Act," which would require Venezuela to deposit 70% of its oil revenues into a New York Federal Reserve account, indicating a long-term strategy to control Venezuelan oil resources [3]. - Major U.S. oil companies, including Chevron and ExxonMobil, are reportedly involved in plans to increase Venezuelan oil production significantly, aiming to dominate the largest heavy oil reserves globally and generate over $10 billion in annual profits once sanctions are lifted [3]. Group 2: China's Strategic Response - Chinese refineries have collectively refused to purchase Venezuelan oil, demonstrating a strong negotiating position due to their substantial oil inventory, which can sustain consumption for 90 days without needing additional imports [5]. - The cost of transporting Venezuelan oil has surged by 40% due to U.S. military blockades, while China has developed alternative shipping routes that allow for cheaper oil imports, further undermining the U.S. strategy [5]. - China's strategic investments in energy security over the past two decades have resulted in a diversified energy supply chain, including increased domestic production and enhanced naval capabilities to protect shipping routes [6]. Group 3: Long-term Energy Strategy - China's energy strategy has evolved significantly, with a focus on reducing dependence on foreign oil and increasing domestic production capabilities, including a reduction in shale oil extraction costs from $80 to $45 per barrel over ten years [6]. - The country has established a comprehensive energy security network, including pipelines and naval escorts, to ensure stable energy supplies, reflecting a shift from reliance on military control to technological and strategic innovation [6]. - The article concludes that the current energy conflict is not merely about oil acquisition but represents a broader strategic competition, where the future of energy will be defined by innovation and adaptability rather than traditional power dynamics [10].