Core Insights - A significant trend has emerged in the domestic financial market, where multiple rural banks and credit cooperatives have announced the closure of debit card overseas transaction functions due to risks associated with overseas fraud [1][2][3] - This move has sparked widespread discussion regarding the cross-border financial operations of small and medium-sized banks, highlighting the challenges they face in re-entering overseas transaction markets once they exit [1][3] Group 1: Closure of Overseas Transaction Functions - As of January 13, 2026, at least 10 small and medium-sized banks have explicitly announced the closure of their debit card overseas transaction functions, primarily among rural banks, with a nationwide distribution across several provinces [1][2] - The closure affects three main categories of overseas transactions: ATM cash withdrawals, POS card payments at physical merchants, and certain online cross-border payment services [2][3] - Different banks have adopted varying strategies for closure, with some implementing a blanket ban while others allow customers to request reactivation of services based on actual needs [3][4] Group 2: Customer Impact and Feedback - For the majority of rural bank customers, the impact of closing overseas transaction functions is negligible, as their customer base primarily consists of rural residents with minimal overseas travel or spending needs [3][4] - Feedback on social media indicates a low level of concern among users, with many stating that the closure does not affect their daily financial activities [4][5] - A small number of users with cross-border needs expressed inconvenience, but overall complaints were minimal, suggesting that the closure aligns with the actual usage patterns of these banks' customer bases [5][6] Group 3: Risk Management and Compliance - The closure of overseas transaction functions is seen as a proactive measure to mitigate risks associated with overseas fraud, which has been a growing concern for both small and large banks [7][8] - Large banks have adopted more sophisticated risk management strategies, while small banks struggle with inadequate technology and expertise to handle complex fraud risks [8][9] - New regulations effective January 1, 2026, requiring identity verification for certain cross-border transactions, further complicate the operational landscape for small banks, increasing compliance costs [8][9] Group 4: Future of Cross-Border Business - Despite the current closures, there remains potential value in cross-border financial services for small banks, particularly if they can align their offerings with local economic needs [9][10] - Future opportunities for re-entering cross-border business will depend on the development of robust risk management systems, clear market positioning, and sustainable profit models [10][11] - The transition back into cross-border services will require a phased approach, focusing on pilot programs and gradual expansion once the necessary conditions are met [11]
从“标配”到“累赘”,中小银行跨境业务选择“战略性撤退”