“美联储传声筒”：鲍威尔不再沉默！主席任期后可能“不走了”

Core Viewpoint - Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell has publicly criticized the government for pressuring the Fed to lower interest rates through threats of criminal investigation, marking a significant shift in his typically cautious communication style [1][3]. Group 1: Powell's Response and Actions - Powell's video statement indicates he will not allow the situation to unfold quietly, emphasizing the importance of the Fed's independence in setting interest rates based on public interest rather than presidential preferences [1][2]. - The unprecedented nature of a criminal investigation against a sitting Fed chairman reflects a serious challenge to the Fed's operational independence [1][3]. - Powell has engaged top legal counsel as a precautionary measure, indicating his commitment to maintaining the Fed's integrity amid external pressures [3][5]. Group 2: Government and Political Reactions - The White House has shifted responsibility for the investigation to the Justice Department, with the Attorney General prioritizing investigations into the misuse of taxpayer funds [2][5]. - President Trump has publicly distanced himself from the investigation, claiming ignorance of the subpoena and asserting that it is unrelated to the Fed's interest rate decisions [2][4]. - Some of Trump's allies believe the pressure may force Powell to resign before the end of his term, potentially allowing Trump to fill another vacancy on the Fed's board [2][3]. Group 3: Implications for the Federal Reserve - The investigation centers on Powell's testimony regarding a $2.5 billion renovation project, which some officials allege involved misrepresentation of costs, suggesting a deeper motive related to the Fed's independence [5][6]. - Analysts express concern that without Powell as a buffer, Trump may redirect his frustrations towards other members of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) [5][6]. - The potential for Powell's dismissal raises questions about the independence of future Fed chairs, as any successor may face similar pressures and scrutiny [6].