世界不需要“新门罗主义”（寰宇平）

Core Viewpoint - The article argues that the "New Monroe Doctrine" represents a dangerous escalation of traditional U.S. hegemonic policies, showcasing a blatant disregard for international law and the principles of sovereign equality among nations [1][2][3]. Group 1: Historical Context and Implications - The "New Monroe Doctrine" is not a new concept but a continuation of U.S. interventionist policies that have historically caused suffering in Latin America, as evidenced by past military interventions and territorial acquisitions [4][5]. - The U.S. aims to ensure that the Western Hemisphere remains under its influence, using military force and economic coercion to control the internal and external affairs of regional countries [3][5]. Group 2: Regional and Global Impact - The U.S. military actions against Venezuela and threats to other Latin American countries are seen as a significant threat to regional stability and the autonomy of these nations, potentially leading to increased political fragmentation and economic hardship [5][6]. - The "New Monroe Doctrine" poses risks not only to Latin America but also to global stability, as it undermines established international laws and norms, leading to a potential normalization of aggressive hegemonic behavior [6][7]. Group 3: International Response and Future Outlook - There is a growing consensus in the international community to defend the principles of international law and the UN Charter against U.S. actions, emphasizing the need for respect for sovereign equality and non-interference [7][8]. - The article concludes that history will ultimately reject the "New Monroe Doctrine," as the principles of justice and fairness will prevail over hegemonic power [7].