在管理和服务对象公司挂证取酬如何定性

Core Viewpoint - The case of Dong, a party member and deputy director of the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission in Area A, highlights the complexities of evaluating the behavior of party members who engage in certificate hanging and remuneration practices, with differing opinions on whether such actions constitute bribery, violations of national laws, or breaches of integrity discipline [1][2][6]. Group 1: Case Background - Dong proposed to hang his first-level cost engineer certificate at Company B, which allowed him to maintain the certificate's registration and increase his income [1]. - From January 2014 to January 2020, Dong received a total of 165,000 yuan from Company B for this arrangement [1]. Group 2: Different Opinions on Dong's Actions - One opinion views Dong's actions as bribery due to the receipt of over 30,000 yuan from an administrative management object, despite the absence of explicit profit-seeking arrangements [2]. - Another opinion categorizes Dong's actions as violations of the Administrative Licensing Law and the Management Measures for Registered Cost Engineers, thus constituting a breach of national laws [4]. - A third opinion asserts that Dong's actions violate integrity discipline, as they could compromise the impartial execution of his duties [5]. Group 3: Legal and Disciplinary Violations - Dong's behavior is deemed a violation of national laws, specifically the prohibition against renting out administrative licenses [4]. - The actions also breach the 2018 Disciplinary Regulations of the Communist Party of China, which prohibit party members from engaging in paid part-time work without approval [5]. Group 4: Conclusion on Disciplinary Action - It is recommended to classify Dong's actions as a violation of integrity discipline, given the potential impact on his public duties and the nature of his position as a party member [6][7].