美国加速变为“规则破坏者”（回声）

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the U.S. military intervention in Venezuela, highlighting it as a manifestation of the resurgence of the Monroe Doctrine and a strategy to maintain hegemony in the Western Hemisphere through force [1][2]. Group 1: U.S. Military Actions - The U.S. military actions in Venezuela signify a shift towards openly using military force to reshape power structures in Latin America, moving away from covert operations and electoral manipulation [1][6]. - The intervention is characterized as a systematic deprivation of sovereignty, with the U.S. aiming to establish a long-term control framework under the guise of "managing" Venezuela [1][6]. Group 2: International Law and Reactions - The military actions violate a fundamental principle of international law, which prohibits the use of force to undermine a nation's territorial integrity or political independence [3][4]. - There is a call for all nations to unite in defending the United Nations Charter and international law against such acts of aggression [3][4]. Group 3: Implications of U.S. Actions - The U.S. intervention is seen as a reflection of its declining control in a multipolar world, with military dominance viewed as a last resort to delay the decline of hegemony [1][6]. - The actions are described as reckless and driven by a desire to plunder resources, which could ultimately backfire on the U.S. itself [5][6].