明抢5000万桶石油后，特朗普转头才发现，中国连一桶都不肯买了

Group 1 - The U.S. has a long history of intervening in Venezuela's oil resources, particularly through sanctions aimed at undermining the Maduro government's economic foundation [2] - The Trump administration's strategy included inviting potential buyers to purchase seized oil resources, but faced market resistance [4] - Venezuela's oil production is low, accounting for only 1% of global output, which limits its market influence [18] Group 2 - The oil supply landscape is expected to change by 2025, with Saudi Arabia, Russia, and Iran dominating China's imports, while Venezuela's share declines [6] - China's energy procurement strategy has evolved to emphasize risk assessment and diversification, reflecting the complexities of global energy trade [4][14] - The U.S. Navy's deployment in the Caribbean has increased logistical difficulties, further complicating Venezuela's oil exports [9] Group 3 - Trump's shift from economic sanctions to direct asset control aimed to accelerate resource monetization but has sparked international controversy [14] - The response from oil companies like ExxonMobil highlights concerns over legal and political risks, which have historically led to uncertain investment returns [12] - Venezuela's oil industry requires significant investment to restore production capacity due to aging infrastructure [11] Group 4 - The global oil market is showing signs of tightening supply by early 2026, but China's inventory system provides a buffer [24] - The lessons from Trump's resource control attempts indicate that buyer autonomy cannot be overlooked in investment strategies [29] - The future of energy trade is leaning towards diversification, with the U.S. intervention in Venezuela having short-term resource gains but long-term implications for global dynamics [31]