刚对全球宣布新关税，特朗普就遭遇当头一棒，赔偿金额或有数万亿

Group 1 - The core point of the article highlights the dual pressure faced by the Trump administration, with aggressive tariff measures aimed at reshaping international trade dynamics while simultaneously confronting significant domestic legal risks [1] - On January 12, Trump announced a 25% tariff on any country conducting business with Iran, indicating a broad punitive measure that targets global trade, including China, and reflects a political rather than economic rationale [3] - The announcement of tariffs has raised concerns about the potential legal challenges from the U.S. Supreme Court, which may rule against the administration's authority to impose such tariffs, leading to significant financial repercussions [4] Group 2 - The internal division within the U.S. government regarding the tariff policy is evident, with Treasury Secretary Mnuchin suggesting that the U.S. could handle potential refunds, contrasting with Trump's alarm over the financial implications of the tariffs [6] - The upcoming Supreme Court ruling on January 14 will be crucial in determining the legality of the tariffs, which could undermine the administration's ability to impose such measures in the future [8] - The article emphasizes that the aggressive tariff strategy may not yield the desired international concessions and could instead exacerbate domestic legal and economic risks, reflecting a precarious balance between external pressure and internal consequences [10]