特朗普算盘落空！中国说到做到，两艘油轮掉头返航，一桶油也不买

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the implications of the U.S. military control over Venezuela's oil resources, highlighting the strategic responses from China and the potential consequences for global energy markets [1][3][34]. Group 1: U.S. Control Over Venezuelan Oil - On January 3, 2026, the U.S. launched a military strike against Venezuela, taking control of its oil industry and announcing plans to extract 50 million barrels of oil [1]. - U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright stated that the U.S. would indefinitely control Venezuela's oil sales, including inventory and future production, with revenues deposited into U.S.-controlled accounts [1][3]. Group 2: China's Response - China, as the largest market for Venezuelan oil, was targeted by the U.S. for increased oil prices, with a $2 per barrel markup for Chinese companies [4][12]. - In response, two Chinese oil tankers, previously waiting to transport oil for debt repayment, turned back, indicating a strategic decision by China to reject U.S. pricing [10][20]. Group 3: Economic Implications - The $2 increase per barrel could lead to an additional cost of approximately $22 million for China based on projected imports of 1,098,200 barrels in 2024 [12]. - The U.S. faces challenges in selling the 50 million barrels of oil, as domestic refineries are not equipped to process the heavy crude from Venezuela, which requires specialized facilities [21][23]. Group 4: International Reactions and Consequences - The U.S. government's unilateral control over Venezuelan oil has drawn criticism, with multiple Latin American countries condemning the actions as violations of sovereignty [27][29]. - The situation has also affected U.S.-China trade negotiations, as China's firm stance against U.S. pricing strategies undermines Trump's leverage [29][36]. Group 5: Broader Implications for Global Order - The article suggests that the U.S. approach of using military power and coercion to control energy resources is failing, emphasizing the need for equal cooperation and mutual benefit in international relations [34][36]. - China's commitment to uphold principles of sovereignty and non-interference reflects its position as a responsible global power, indicating a shift towards a more equitable international order [36][38].