知名公司起诉前CEO：掏空公司，与已婚情人、前副总裁“潜逃”美国；常说“我对钱没兴趣”

Core Viewpoint - The company, Xunlei, has officially filed a lawsuit against its former CEO, Chen Lei, accusing him of harming the company's interests, with the Shenzhen court accepting the case [1]. Group 1: Background of the Case - The lawsuit has reignited discussions about the corruption scandal involving Chen Lei, who was dismissed as CEO in April 2020 due to allegations of embezzlement and creating false contracts to siphon company funds [3]. - Chen Lei and former senior vice president Dong Xue fled abroad to evade investigation, leading to the eventual withdrawal of the case [3][4]. Group 2: Financial Impact - Under Chen Lei's leadership, Xunlei incurred losses of nearly 1 billion yuan over three years, with a significant decline in revenue attributed to his push for a blockchain business that ultimately failed [5]. - The company’s financial troubles were exacerbated by internal governance issues, including asset misappropriation and nepotism [15]. Group 3: Mechanisms of Misappropriation - Chen Lei allegedly used a company called Xing Rong He to facilitate the misappropriation of nearly 200 million yuan, which was disguised as legitimate business transactions [7]. - The approval process for these transactions was controlled by Chen Lei and Dong Xue, creating a conflict of interest and allowing for significant financial irregularities [9]. Group 4: Internal Dynamics and Corruption - Chen Lei and Dong Xue's personal relationship reportedly influenced corporate governance, leading to preferential treatment and financial misconduct within the company [12]. - Employees reported a toxic corporate culture where personal relationships with executives were necessary for career advancement, and financial misconduct was normalized [13]. Group 5: Legal and Ethical Implications - The ongoing legal proceedings highlight the importance of corporate governance and the need for stringent oversight to prevent similar issues in the future [15][17]. - Experts emphasize that the case serves as a cautionary tale for companies regarding the selection and monitoring of executives, stressing the need for ethical standards and accountability [16][17].