美国对欧洲加征关税 要求购买格陵兰岛 各国回应不可接受

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses President Trump's controversial linkage of trade tariffs to the ambition of purchasing Greenland, which has escalated tensions between the U.S. and its European allies [1][3]. Group 1: Trade Tariffs and Economic Impact - Trump announced a 10% tariff on goods from Denmark, Germany, France, and six other European countries starting February 1, with a potential increase to 25% if Europe does not agree to the "complete and total purchase" of Greenland [1][3]. - The tariffs specifically target key European export industries such as automobiles, machinery, and luxury goods, aiming to leverage economic pressure to force concessions on territorial sovereignty [3][5]. Group 2: European Response and Unity - European nations collectively condemned Trump's actions, with leaders from Sweden and Norway emphasizing that they would not be coerced and that the fate of Greenland should be determined by its people [3][5]. - Germany announced plans to collaborate with European partners to formulate a counter-strategy, while the EU warned that U.S. actions could lead to a "dangerous vicious cycle" damaging transatlantic relations [5][7]. Group 3: Strategic Importance of Greenland - Greenland's strategic location is highlighted as crucial for U.S. missile warning and defense systems, as well as for emerging commercial and military routes due to melting Arctic ice [5][7]. - The island's rich resources, including rare earth minerals, are seen as vital for future Arctic competition, aligning with U.S. hegemonic interests [5][7]. Group 4: Implications for NATO and International Relations - The situation poses a direct challenge to NATO, as the U.S. is perceived to be undermining the collective defense spirit by coercing allies over territorial issues [7]. - The attempt to "purchase" territory is viewed as a violation of international law and the UN Charter, raising concerns about the potential for global order disruption [7].