欧洲8国集体反对美国加征关税 ，坚决捍卫主权。

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. tariff threat is fundamentally an economic tool to coerce territorial sovereignty issues, deviating from international law principles and the approach to allies [2] Group 1: U.S. Tariff Actions - The Trump administration announced a 10% tariff on goods from 8 countries starting February 1, increasing to 25% on June 1, until a "complete and thorough purchase of Greenland" agreement is reached [2] - The use of tariffs as a weapon represents a shift in U.S. foreign policy, turning ally relationships into coercive tools [2] Group 2: European Response - Eight European countries quickly formed a united front to defend national sovereignty and dignity against U.S. coercion [4] - Swedish Prime Minister Kristersson stated that Sweden "will not be extorted," emphasizing that the decision regarding Greenland belongs to Denmark and its people [4] - Danish Deputy Prime Minister Poulsen condemned the U.S. threat as "completely unacceptable," reaffirming the importance of international law and territorial sovereignty for global peace [4] Group 3: Major European Powers' Stance - French President Macron criticized the U.S. tariff threat as "unacceptable," promising a coordinated European response to defend European sovereignty [6] - The German government initiated consultations with European partners to take appropriate countermeasures [6] - British Prime Minister Starmer described the U.S. actions as "completely wrong," asserting that the future of Greenland should be decided by Denmark and its people [6] Group 4: EU's Support and Trade Relations - The EU's strong backing adds confidence to the eight countries, indicating a potential restructuring of transatlantic trade relations [8] - EU Commission President von der Leyen and European Council President Costa issued a joint statement highlighting that U.S. tariffs would damage transatlantic relations and reiterating solidarity with Denmark and the people of Greenland [8] - The European Parliament has suspended the approval process for a previously agreed EU-U.S. trade agreement, with calls for the activation of EU anti-coercion tools in response to U.S. bullying [8] Group 5: Historical Context and Implications - Historical experiences show that tariff bullying can backfire, as seen during the Great Depression with the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, which led to a global trade collapse [10] - The collective resistance from the eight European countries is not only to defend their sovereignty and economic interests but also a strong opposition to unilateralism and hegemonic behavior [10] - In today's deeply integrated global economy, adherence to international law and respect for national sovereignty through equal dialogue is essential to avoid escalating trade conflicts and maintain the stability of the global trade system [10]