特朗普为何强夺格陵兰岛？贝森特：因为欧洲“软弱”

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. plans to impose a 10% tariff on goods exported from Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the UK, the Netherlands, and Finland starting February 1, until an agreement for the "complete and total purchase of Greenland" is reached [1] Group 1: U.S. Government Actions - U.S. Treasury Secretary Mnuchin supports the tariff, claiming Europe is too "weak" to ensure Greenland's security, thus necessitating U.S. protection [1] - The U.S. aims to establish a "Golden Dome" missile defense system, with Greenland being a crucial part of this strategy [1] - Mnuchin downplays the EU's threats to halt a previous tariff agreement, asserting that the trade deal is not finalized and that European leaders will ultimately seek U.S. security [1] Group 2: European Responses - Swedish Prime Minister Kristersson states that they will not be coerced, emphasizing that only Denmark and Greenland can decide on related matters [2] - UK Prime Minister Starmer calls the U.S. tariff threat "completely wrong," while Danish officials express that the policy is unexpected and unacceptable [2] - French President Macron labels the tariff threat as "unacceptable," asserting that Europe will respond in a united manner to defend its sovereignty [2] Group 3: Political Reactions in the U.S. - Bipartisan concerns arise within Washington, with both Republican and Democratic senators urging the Trump administration to cease threats and pursue diplomacy [2] - Senator Rand Paul criticizes the idea of purchasing Greenland as "absurd," arguing that there is no urgency for such a transaction [3] - Senator Chris Van Hollen accuses Trump of "land grabbing" aimed at acquiring Greenland's mineral resources [3] - White House Chief Economic Advisor Hassett suggests a more diplomatic approach, advocating for a return to negotiations for a mutually beneficial agreement [3]