Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes that international law based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter is essential for maintaining the current international order [1] - US Treasury Secretary Bessent criticized Europe for its "weakness" and stated that the US must control Greenland for global stability [2][3] - The US government has imposed economic pressure on Europe, including a 10% tariff on goods from several European countries starting February 1, with a potential increase to 25% if an agreement on Greenland is not reached [2][3] Group 2 - Concerns about the long-term stability of US-Europe relations have intensified, with experts noting a shift in European perceptions of the US under Biden's administration [3][4] - The US National Security Strategy document indicates a desire to help Europe "correct its current trajectory" and support "patriotic parties" in Europe, which is seen as an unusual intervention in European politics [4] - The EU has responded defensively, planning a special meeting of member states to address the situation and emphasizing the protection of Greenland's sovereignty [5] Group 3 - European leaders, including French President Macron, are coordinating responses to the US tariffs and pushing for the activation of the EU's "anti-coercion instrument" to counter economic pressure [5] - There is a growing sentiment among European officials that the tariffs could poison transatlantic relations, with calls for Europe to demonstrate its political and economic strength [5][6] - Some US Republican senators have expressed concerns about the tariffs, labeling them as unnecessary and detrimental to US interests [6]
美国强购格陵兰岛冲击跨大西洋秩序,专家:人们开始质疑美欧关系长期稳定性