一级市场，如何优雅的怼人

Group 1 - The company is facing pressure to deploy funds quickly, as there are concerns about the timely investment of capital raised from limited partners (LPs) [1][2] - There is a discussion about the viability of investing in certain projects, such as perovskite projects, indicating potential challenges in securing future funding rounds [1][2] - The company is exploring co-general partner (co-GP) arrangements due to a lack of trust from government entities regarding their ability to operate independently as a GP [2] Group 2 - There are inquiries about the company's ability to identify and invest in early-stage hard technology projects within specific regions, suggesting a focus on local investment opportunities [3] - The company is under scrutiny regarding its ability to meet return on investment commitments, with discussions about the potential for exceeding return ratios [3] - The company is involved in a pre-IPO project that is expected to go public soon, but there are concerns about the timing of fund cycles and the ability to take on existing shares [3] Group 3 - The company is questioned about the transparency of its investments, particularly regarding the visibility of certain companies in public databases [4] - There is a dialogue about the challenges of justifying investment decisions to local government officials, emphasizing the inherent risks in venture capital [4] - The company is tasked with selecting fund managers for a government-backed fund, highlighting the complexities of investment logic in different regional contexts [5]