英国《卫报》认为，欧盟若同意将格陵兰岛“割让”给美国，可能会向基辅发出灾难性的信号

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the potential implications of the U.S. possibly acquiring Greenland, highlighting the contradiction it poses to the principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity that Western nations have supported in the context of Ukraine. This situation raises concerns about the future of international norms and alliances, particularly for Ukraine, which relies on Western support in its conflict with Russia [3][5][11]. Group 1: U.S. Actions and Implications - The U.S. President has threatened to impose tariffs on Denmark and other EU countries if they do not agree to the sale of Greenland, indicating a shift from diplomatic negotiations to coercive tactics [3][5]. - The notion of trading territory, as suggested by the U.S. administration, undermines the established principle of inviolable sovereignty, which has been a cornerstone of Western political rhetoric [5][9]. Group 2: European Response and Concerns - European leaders, including the Prime Ministers of the UK and France, have expressed alarm over the U.S. approach, fearing it could erode the moral foundation of Western alliances and lead to a prioritization of economic interests over shared values [11][13]. - The potential sale of Greenland is seen as a threat not only to Denmark's sovereignty but also to the security of smaller EU nations, raising fears of a domino effect in the region [7][11]. Group 3: Impact on Ukraine - The situation places Ukraine in a precarious position, as its fate appears to be intertwined with the geopolitical maneuvering surrounding Greenland, highlighting the fragility of its support from Western allies [11][13]. - The article suggests that if the EU allows the sale of Greenland, it could signal to Russia that territorial integrity can be negotiated, undermining Ukraine's position in its conflict with Russia [9][11].