罕见！多家央行为何“干涉”美国内政？

Core Viewpoint - The joint statement from multiple central banks supporting Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell reflects rising concerns over systemic risks amid declining confidence in the dollar [1][5][12] Group 1: Central Banks' Support - The U.S. Department of Justice issued a subpoena to the Federal Reserve, escalating ongoing political disputes into the criminal justice realm [3] - Powell confirmed receipt of the subpoena and indicated that the DOJ is considering criminal charges related to his testimony in June 2025 [4] - Central bank leaders from the European Central Bank, Bank of England, and Bank of Canada, along with the Bank for International Settlements, publicly emphasized the importance of maintaining the independence of the Federal Reserve [5] Group 2: Economic Implications - The support from multiple central banks is driven by economic interests aimed at maintaining financial stability within their own systems [7] - The Federal Reserve's independence is seen as a cornerstone of the dollar's credit system; any political interference could lead to significant repercussions [7][8] - A loss of confidence in the dollar could trigger a widespread revaluation of global assets, as the dollar accounts for approximately 58% of global foreign exchange reserves [8] Group 3: Policy Coordination Challenges - Disruption in existing monetary policy coordination mechanisms is anticipated, as central banks often need to predict the Federal Reserve's interest rate path [9] - If the Fed's decisions shift from economic data to political signals, it could significantly increase policy-making costs and exacerbate market volatility [9] Group 4: Global Financial Governance - The joint statement inadvertently highlights the shared consensus among major Western economies regarding central bank independence [12] - The pressure from the Trump administration on the Federal Reserve is viewed as a systemic challenge to global central bank independence, raising concerns about a potential "broken window effect" [12] - The need for a more effective crisis response mechanism in global financial governance is underscored, especially as U.S. domestic political struggles could have far-reaching financial impacts beyond its borders [13]