反川普挺欧洲，中方一语双关，福山：中国能击败美国，欧洲也能行

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles emphasizes China's strong opposition to the U.S. actions regarding Greenland and the use of tariffs as a diplomatic tool by Trump, highlighting the importance of maintaining international order based on the UN Charter [1][3] - China's stance is not only a rejection of Trump's territorial ambitions but also a critique of the U.S. pressuring European countries through tariffs, suggesting that such actions violate existing international norms [3][1] - The articles reflect a broader sentiment among scholars like Francis Fukuyama, who advocates for Europe to adopt a more resilient stance against U.S. bullying, drawing parallels with China's approach to resist pressure [5][8] Group 2 - Fukuyama argues that Europe's past strategies of appeasement towards Trump have been ineffective, warning that continued concessions could lead to more unreasonable demands from the U.S. [5][9] - Historical examples are provided where countries like China, India, and Brazil successfully resisted U.S. pressure, suggesting that a firm stance can earn respect from the U.S. rather than submission [8][9] - The articles highlight the dilemma Europe faces: whether to continue its long-standing strategy of compromise or to muster the courage to confront the U.S. directly, which is essential for regaining agency in international relations [9][8]