欧洲军演弄巧成拙，特朗普话越说越绝，还有退路吗？

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses President Trump's persistent interest in acquiring Greenland, which has escalated into a significant diplomatic crisis between the U.S. and Europe, particularly Denmark [1][5][12]. Group 1: Trump's Greenland Acquisition Plans - Trump initially proposed the idea of acquiring Greenland during his first term, which has since evolved into a strong obsession, leading to heightened tensions with European allies [1][4]. - The White House has indicated readiness to execute any acquisition plan selected by the president, emphasizing the strategic rationale behind the proposal [2][12]. - Trump's administration views control over Greenland as crucial for national security, with discussions around potential military actions and tariffs as negotiation tools [10][12]. Group 2: Diplomatic Reactions and Strategies - European leaders are still hopeful for a negotiated agreement, with some suggesting a joint control arrangement as a strategic compromise [2][3]. - The recent military exercises by NATO countries in Greenland have been perceived as counterproductive, provoking a stronger response from Trump [10][11]. - Trump's threats of tariffs against countries opposing his Greenland plans have escalated tensions, with specific rates proposed for several European nations [10][11]. Group 3: Strategic Importance of Greenland - Greenland's geographical and strategic significance is highlighted, particularly in relation to missile defense systems and U.S. military presence in the Arctic [12][13]. - Trump's insistence on full ownership of Greenland is framed as essential for maximizing its strategic value, despite existing U.S. military capabilities in the region [13][14]. - The article notes that while Denmark is open to U.S. military cooperation, Trump’s vision remains focused on complete territorial control [13][14].