集体决定违规摊派如何定性处理

Core Viewpoint - The actions of the A Town Party Committee and its officials, including the requirement for winning bidders to donate to a local charity, are characterized as violations of party discipline and improper fundraising practices, which adversely affect the relationship between the party and the public [2][3][8]. Group 1: Actions and Implications - A Town's decision to require donations from winning bidders is deemed a collective violation of discipline, categorized as improper fundraising that burdens the public [3][6]. - The actions of Li and Wang, who facilitated this requirement, are viewed as violations of work discipline and public discipline, with Wang's modifications to the funding approval process being a critical element of this misconduct [2][7][8]. - The total amount donated by over 30 companies through the local charity to the district charity reached 3 million yuan by June 2025, indicating the scale of the improper fundraising [1]. Group 2: Legal and Disciplinary Framework - The requirement for donations does not constitute a crime of unit bribery, as the funds were directed to a charity rather than being received by A Town, lacking the necessary intent and action for such a charge [4][5]. - The collective decision-making process of the A Town Party Committee aligns with the provisions of the disciplinary regulations, which hold the leadership accountable for collective misconduct [6][8]. - Wang's actions, which included modifying the funding approval process and urging companies to donate, are classified as violations of both work discipline and public discipline, reflecting the serious nature of the misconduct [7][8].