外国一小哥把马斯克的星链给切开了，发现里面没啥东西，里面有一块电路板，和一个类似发动机的东西，感觉没啥技术含量，不过外形看上去像一台苹果电脑，做工非常先进，感觉星链在国内很多公司都可以做出来，不知道是不是这样？外网最近有一段视频热度极高：一位外国博主操起工具，把马斯克家的星链终端给大卸...

Core Viewpoint - The disassembly of SpaceX's Starlink terminal reveals a simple internal structure, but the true complexity lies in the extensive satellite communication system and the technology behind it, which is not easily replicable by other companies [1][2][4]. Group 1: Technology and Complexity - The visible hardware of Starlink, such as the circuit board and components, is only a small part of the overall technology, which includes advanced algorithms and cost management in rocket launches [2][4]. - The integration of phased array antennas in the Starlink terminal allows for automatic tracking of high-speed satellites, a technology that was previously exclusive to military applications [4]. Group 2: Industry Comparison - While domestic companies like Galaxy Space and Geely's "Star Era" are working on low Earth orbit satellite communications, their total number of operational satellites is significantly lower than SpaceX's [2][3]. - The difference between being able to produce technology and successfully implementing it commercially is highlighted, with SpaceX's aggressive approach to testing and scaling contrasting with the more cautious domestic efforts [3][5]. Group 3: Market Dynamics and Challenges - SpaceX's success is attributed to its willingness to invest heavily in R&D and take risks, which is not as prevalent in traditional aerospace frameworks [3][5]. - The current regulatory and operational environment in China poses challenges for the rapid commercialization of low Earth orbit satellite projects, which are often hindered by approval processes and industry coordination [3][5]. Group 4: Future Outlook - As China progresses in 5G infrastructure, satellite navigation, and commercial space policies, there is potential for domestic companies to eventually surpass current capabilities in low Earth orbit satellite technology [5]. - The notion that technology is not merely about visible components but also about the execution and ecosystem surrounding it is emphasized, suggesting that future advancements may lead to better solutions than those currently offered by SpaceX [5].