The FTC's Case Against Meta Is Discredited Not Just By The AI Present

Core Viewpoint - The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is appealing a previously dismissed antitrust lawsuit against Meta, but the appeal is undermined by historical context and current market dynamics [2][3]. Group 1: Historical Context of Acquisitions - Facebook acquired Instagram for $1 billion in 2012 and WhatsApp for $19 billion in 2014, which the FTC claims were anticompetitive actions to maintain a monopoly in social networking [3]. - The total expenditure of $20 billion for these acquisitions raises questions about the validity of the FTC's claims regarding monopoly power [4]. - Following the acquisitions, Facebook's stock actually declined, indicating that investors did not perceive these purchases as indicative of monopoly status [5][6]. Group 2: Current Market Dynamics - In 2025, Meta invested over $70 billion in data centers, which contradicts the notion of a monopoly that would not need to invest heavily to protect its market position [7][8]. - The concept of monopolies is challenged by the fact that they typically do not face competition, and thus would not require such significant expenditures to maintain their business [8]. - The technology sector has evolved significantly since the introduction of ChatGPT in late 2022, leading to substantial investments aimed at adapting to a rapidly changing landscape [9][10]. Group 3: Weakness of the FTC's Case - The FTC's original lawsuit in 2020 was already weak, and the appeal in 2026 is considered even weaker due to the changing dynamics in the technology sector and Meta's substantial investments [9][10].