“响应度”更高，解民忧更及时（人民时评）

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the transition from "response to demands" to "problem anticipation" in improving the predictability and foresight of public welfare work [1][2] - The implementation of the "Snail Award" in some regions serves as a measure to hold departments and officials accountable for inefficiency and negligence in handling public demands [1] - The article highlights the importance of rapid response and efficient problem-solving as essential elements in safeguarding and enhancing public welfare [1][2] Group 2 - Higher "responsiveness" not only improves public satisfaction but also helps to resolve conflicts at their source, thereby enhancing grassroots governance effectiveness [2] - Initiatives like the "small injury quick compensation" program in Beijing demonstrate how streamlined processes can provide timely support to new employment groups [2] - The article discusses the need for a proactive work style, as advocated by Xi Jinping, to address public concerns without falling into formalism and bureaucratic practices [2][3] Group 3 - The use of technology and mechanism reforms is highlighted as a method to continuously improve governance efficiency, with examples such as the establishment of data analysis platforms in Hebei [3] - The implementation of smart management information platforms in Fujian and rapid response mechanisms in Shandong showcases the effectiveness of breaking down bureaucratic barriers and reducing processing times [3] - The article concludes that addressing public welfare issues requires a commitment to serving the community effectively, ensuring that both individual and collective needs are met [3]