IC Markets官网：理想人选难觅？特朗普的“完美”美联储主席

Core Viewpoint - Trump's selection of the next Federal Reserve Chair is fraught with challenges due to conflicting demands for loyalty to the White House and the need for market trust in the Fed's independence [1][3]. Group 1: Selection Criteria and Challenges - Trump's ideal candidate must be loyal to the White House, able to adjust monetary policy, and gain market trust to lower long-term borrowing costs, but these requirements are difficult to reconcile in the political and economic landscape [1][3]. - The independence of the Federal Reserve is crucial for market trust, and the demand for loyalty to the White House contradicts this independence, making the selection process challenging [3]. Group 2: Candidates and Their Shortcomings - The two leading candidates, Kevin Hassett and Kevin Warsh, have shown weaknesses that limit their viability. Hassett lacks market recognition and is viewed as unable to maintain the Fed's independence, while Warsh's hawkish stance conflicts with Trump's desire for lower interest rates [3][4]. - Rick Rieder and Christopher Waller have emerged as more viable candidates, each representing a compromise in the selection process. Rieder is seen as a "globalist" with a strong market background but lacks formal Fed experience, while Waller is a traditionalist with a strong grasp of economic policy but may not align with Trump's desire to influence the Fed [4][6]. Group 3: Policy Implications and Future Directions - The next Fed Chair will face critical decisions regarding the management of the Fed's balance sheet, which currently stands at $6.6 trillion. Disagreements on this issue reflect differing views on the Fed's policy direction [6]. - The selection of either Rieder or Waller could significantly impact U.S. and global economic policies, with the final decision likely being a compromise between loyalty, market trust, and policy alignment [7].