最高检发布个人信息保护检察公益诉讼典型案例

Core Viewpoint The Supreme People's Procuratorate has released six typical cases of public interest litigation related to personal information protection, highlighting the importance of safeguarding citizens' personal data in various sectors, including smart parking, facial recognition, and online job recruitment. The initiative aims to enhance the enforcement of personal information protection laws and promote comprehensive governance in cyberspace. Group 1: Overview of Cases - The released cases cover issues such as smart parking, facial recognition in residential areas, online job scams, "box opening" incidents, and the misuse of personal information by scalpers and travel agencies [1][2] - The publication aims to implement the directives from the 20th Central Committee regarding the deepening of cybersecurity governance and the strengthening of personal information protection [1][2] Group 2: Specific Cases - Case 1: In Hebei, the procuratorate addressed issues with smart parking apps that collected excessive personal information, leading to a coordinated effort among multiple administrative bodies to rectify the situation [5][6][9] - Case 2: In Chongqing, the procuratorate focused on the misuse of facial recognition technology by property management companies, resulting in recommendations for regulatory compliance and industry-wide reforms [12][15][17] - Case 3: In Guangdong, the procuratorate tackled online job scams that exploited job seekers' personal information, utilizing big data to enhance oversight and promote systemic governance in the recruitment industry [20][22][24] - Case 4: In Zhejiang, the procuratorate initiated civil public interest litigation against individuals involved in "box opening" activities that violated personal privacy, emphasizing the need for judicial accountability [29][30][36] - Case 5: In Shanghai, the procuratorate addressed the illegal collection of personal information of deceased individuals and their relatives by healthcare workers, leading to regulatory recommendations to prevent such violations [37][38][41] - Case 6: In Jiangxi, the procuratorate focused on the misuse of personal information by scalpers and travel agencies in the tourism sector, advocating for stronger regulatory measures to protect personal data [46][47][50] Group 3: Legal and Regulatory Implications - The Supreme People's Procuratorate emphasizes the need for precise legal definitions and effective enforcement mechanisms in handling public interest litigation related to personal information protection [3][4] - The initiative aims to foster collaboration among various governmental departments to enhance the overall governance framework for personal information protection [3][4][19] - The cases serve as practical examples for improving the legal system surrounding personal information protection, highlighting the importance of public participation and technological support in enforcement efforts [3][4][19]