消息称美国加州法院裁定苹果隐私集体诉讼胜诉

Group 1 - The case revolves around whether Apple violated user privacy by allegedly collecting detailed usage data from iPhone users without explicit consent, in violation of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) [1] - The legal dispute traces back to a technical discovery by security researcher Tommy Mysk over three years ago, revealing that the App Store sends detailed user operation data in real-time, regardless of user consent [3][4] - The court dismissed the plaintiff's claims, stating that the legal basis for the accusations was insufficient, highlighting contradictions and unclear definitions in the plaintiff's arguments [3] Group 2 - Mysk's tests indicated that Apple collects the same application data regardless of whether users click "agree," which he described as shocking and indicative of a broader issue within Apple's ecosystem [4] - The court's ruling focused more on the technical interpretation of legal terms like "confidential" and "communication," rather than a moral judgment on Apple's data collection practices [4]