Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles revolves around Trump's sudden shift from a confrontational stance regarding Greenland to a diplomatic approach facilitated by NATO, which temporarily alleviates the threat of a transatlantic trade war but raises concerns about the unpredictability of his policies [1][2]. - Trump's announcement on January 21, stating that he would not implement the planned tariffs on Europe, marks a significant turn in the ongoing controversy over Greenland, although the details of the agreement remain unclear [1][2]. - The unexpected change disrupted a planned EU leaders' emergency meeting aimed at forming a united front against Trump's perceived economic coercion and territorial ambitions, highlighting the ongoing uncertainty in the market despite the temporary relief from tariff threats [1][2]. Group 2 - The focus of the discussions has shifted from territorial acquisition to security cooperation, with Trump hinting at U.S. interests in mineral rights and missile defense systems in Greenland, although he acknowledged the complexity of the proposal [2]. - European capitals are left confused by Trump's erratic behavior, with officials expressing concerns that his flexibility could undermine EU unity and exacerbate internal competition among member states regarding trade and geopolitical issues [2]. - Denmark has firmly reiterated that Greenland is not for sale, with its Foreign Minister emphasizing that U.S. ownership of the territory is a "red line," while also signaling a willingness to negotiate on security concerns [3].
特朗普180度转折，欧洲懵了
Hua Er Jie Jian Wen·2026-01-22 06:50