Jin Shi Shu Ju·2026-01-22 10:09Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the growing culture of self-censorship among executives in the financial industry due to the unpredictable policies of the Trump administration, highlighting concerns about potential repercussions for speaking out against the government [1][2][3]. Group 1: Executive Concerns - Executives from major investment firms are expressing concerns about the impact of rapidly changing U.S. policies on global markets, particularly in light of Trump's controversial actions [1]. - There is a notable reluctance among executives to publicly address sensitive topics related to U.S. policies, with some advising teams to avoid controversial comments regarding U.S.-Europe relations [2][3]. - The fear of backlash from the Trump administration is leading to a culture of caution, where analysts worry that critical reports could hinder their firms' ability to operate in the U.S. [2][4]. Group 2: Impact on Research and Reporting - Deutsche Bank's recent report predicting a decline in European willingness to hold U.S. assets due to Trump's actions has led to attempts by the bank's CEO to distance the firm from the report [1][4]. - Analysts are increasingly modifying their reports to avoid potential criticism from the Trump administration, with some even redacting parts of their analyses to mitigate risks [4]. - The emphasis on producing independent and impactful research is being overshadowed by the need to avoid unnecessary provocations that could embarrass the government [4]. Group 3: Market Reactions - Danish and Swedish pension funds are withdrawing from U.S. Treasury bonds due to concerns over U.S. policies, budget deficits, and national debt unpredictability [5]. - The actions of these funds reflect a broader trend of caution among international investors regarding U.S. assets amid the current political climate [5].